Work & case studiesEvidence before claims.

Every project,
open to inspection.

Explore the questions, decisions, and artifacts behind our analysis, prototypes, concepts, and engineering methods.

Each entry identifies what was made, its source, and its limitations.

Independent analysis

From a ride record
to a clearer question.

Explore the Cyclistic source figures, model and disclosed assumptions.

Inspect the case study
Cyclistic daily bike ride counts across 2025 and 2026.
Python repository artifact · source run unverified

Projects, prototypes
& published methods.

3 entries
Project 01 / 03
Published engineering methodApplied AI evaluation

Production RAG Validation Suite

A published evaluation method for testing retrieval quality, groundedness, and failure boundaries before a knowledge assistant is released.

  • Hybrid retrieval
  • Cross-encoder reranking
  • Groundedness evaluation

Concept preview · evaluation method

Question, contribution & scope
The question
A convincing demo answer does not establish retrieval quality or reliable handling of unsupported questions.
The approach
Evaluate chunking, hybrid retrieval, reranking, citations, and refusals against a representative question set.

A technical guide with a readiness checklist and a retrieval trade-off table.

Scope: A written methodology, not an implemented benchmark product or a published scored evaluation run.

1 of 3: Production RAG Validation Suite

Have a problem that does not fit a category?

Most real systems cross more than one discipline. Bring the constraint and we will map the smallest reliable path through it.